Recently the Toronto Star posted an article on a new mental health strategy announced by Legal Aid Ontario. This is our Association’s response:
Letter to the Editor – Re: Legal Aid Ontario releases pioneering mental health strategy: Goar
Legal Aid’s sudden commitment to improving the level and quality of legal services it provides to the mentally ill is encouraging, but sadly long overdue, and, ultimately, flawed.
The Criminal Lawyers’ Association membership, which is made up of over 1000 private defence counsel, many of whom take Legal Aid files, sees this announcement as window dressing to hide the grossly underfunded resources that are required to actually address the legal problems of the mentally ill on the ground.
As anyone who has spent years representing the mentally ill before courts and tribunals will tell you, the real solution to the actual legal needs of the mentally ill is patience and commitment, and that requires time and money.
The one thing conspicuously absent from this announcement is the additional money for it, from the provincial government. Without new money, existing funds for indigent defence must be diverted and this necessarily means reducing funding to other vulnerable groups who depend on Legal Aid’s assistance. These groups include refugees, child protection matters, and persons asserting their innocence–groups who are brought into the legal system largely in response to the same government, one might add, that funds both their prosecution and their defence.
Indeed, we question whether this initiative is the wisest use of Legal Aid monies. In the age of specialization, the proclaimed expanded use of existing untrained staff lawyers at Legal Aid, for example, in an attempt to bring them up to speed to fill a hole does not make sense. Counsel of choice, with many more years of experience actually fighting for the rights of the mentally ill, are already out there, at the hospitals and at hearings and trials, taking these cases daily. Private counsel, taking Legal Aid matters are better, already specialized, and more cost-effective
at dealing with legal problems than this creation of a new, soon to be entrenched bureaucracy. Legal Aid’s own studies have borne this out in the past.
One would have wished for a more balanced reporting of this issue.